Briefly, this error occurs when Elasticsearch is unable to understand the mapping provided for a specific type. This could be due to incorrect syntax, unsupported field type, or a mismatch between the data type and the mapping type. To resolve this issue, you can: 1) Check and correct the syntax of your mapping, 2) Ensure that the field types you’re using are supported by Elasticsearch, and 3) Make sure that the data type of your fields matches the mapping type.
In addition we recommend you run the Elasticsearch Template Optimizer to fix problems in your data modeling.
It will analyze your templates to detect issues and improve search performance, reduce indexing bottlenecks and optimize storage utilization. The Template Optimizer is free and requires no installation.
Overview
Mapping is similar to database schemas that define the properties of each field in the index. These properties may contain the data type of each field and how fields are going to be tokenized and indexed. In addition, the mapping may also contain various advanced level properties for each field to define the options exposed by Lucene and Elasticsearch.
You can create a mapping of an index using the _mappings REST endpoint. The very first time Elasticsearch finds a new field whose mapping is not pre-defined inside the index, it automatically tries to guess the data type and analyzer of that field and set its default value. For example, if you index an integer field without pre-defining the mapping, Elasticsearch sets the mapping of that field as long.
Examples
Create an index with predefined mapping:
PUT /my_index?pretty { "settings": { "number_of_shards": 1 }, "mappings": { "properties": { "name": { "type": "text" }, "age": { "type": "integer" } } } }
Create mapping in an existing index:
PUT /my_index/_mapping?pretty { "properties": { "email": { "type": "keyword" } } }
View the mapping of an existing index:
GET my_index/_mapping?pretty
View the mapping of an existing field:
GET /my_index/_mapping/field/name?pretty
Notes
- It is not possible to update the mapping of an existing field. If the mapping is set to the wrong type, re-creating the index with updated mapping and re-indexing is the only option available.
- In version 7.0, Elasticsearch has deprecated the document type and the default document type is set to _doc. In future versions of Elasticsearch, the document type will be removed completely.
How to optimize your Elasticsearch mapping to reduce costs
Watch the video below to learn how to save money on your deployment by optimizing your mapping.
Common problems
- The most common problem in Elasticsearch is incorrectly defined mapping which limits the functionality of the field. For example, if the data type of a string field is set as text, you cannot use that field for aggregations, sorting or exact match filters. Similarly, if a string field is dynamically indexed without predefined mapping, Elasticsearch automatically creates two fields internally. One as a text type for full-text search and another as keyword type, which in most cases is a waste of space.
- Elasticsearch automatically creates an _all field inside the mapping and copies values of each field of a document inside the _all field. This field is used to search text without specifying a field name. Make sure to disable the _all field in production environments to avoid wasting space. Please note that support for the _all field has been removed in version 7.0.
- In versions lower than 5.0, it was possible to create multiple document types inside an index, similar to creating multiple tables inside a database. In those versions, there were higher chances of getting data types conflicts across different document types if they contained the same field name with different data types.
- The mapping of each index is part of the cluster state and is managed by master nodes. If the mapping is too big, meaning there are thousands of fields in the index, the cluster state grows too large to be handled and creates the issue of mapping explosion, resulting in the slowness of the cluster.
Overview
Deprecation refers to processes and functions that are in the process of being eliminated and (possibly) replaced by newer ones.
Typically, a function will not disappear from one version to the next without warning. Normally this will happen across a number of versions. When you use a deprecated function in intermediate versions, it will continue to work as before, but you will receive warnings that the function in question is intended to disappear in the future.
How it works
There are a number of ways you can find out which functions have been deprecated, including: deprecation logs, reading the breaking pages documentation and paying attention to warnings.
In a deprecation log:
{"type": "deprecation", "timestamp": "2020-01-16T12:50:11,263+0000", "level": "WARN", "component": "o.e.d.r.a.d.RestDeleteAction", "cluster.name": "docker-cluster", "node.name": "es01", "cluster.uuid": "VGTYFgunQ_STTKVz6YHAGg", "node.id": "wh5J7TJ-RD-pJE4JOUjVpw", "message": "[types removal] Specifying types in document index requests is deprecated, use the typeless endpoints instead (/{index}/_doc/{id}, /{index}/_doc, or /{index}/_create/{id})." }
Reading the breaking changes documentation for each version:
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.5/breaking-changes-7.0.html
In kibana you may also see a warning if you run a deprecated command in the development panel:
#! Deprecation: [types removal] Specifying types in document index requests is deprecated, use the typeless endpoints instead (/{index}/_doc/{id}, /{index}/_doc, or /{index}/_create/{id}).
It is important to act upon these warnings. Although your application still works, ignoring the warnings will almost certainly cause things to malfunction in a future upgrade.
Deprecation API
There is a depreciation API, which can help point you to deprecated functions on your cluster:
Version 5.6-6.8 | GET /_xpack/migration/deprecations |
Version 7 | GET /_migration/deprecations |
However, you should never depend on the deprecation API alone. Just because the API returns with no issues, it does not mean that everything in your setup will work out of the box when migrating! This is to be used in addition to looking through the deprecation log and breaking changes documentation.
Examples
- The removal of document types (“_type”) . Various document types were allowed in a single index in version 6, but this functionality has been removed. You will get warnings if you use document types in queries, and only 1 document type is allowed per index in version 7. The functionality is expected to be completely removed in version 8.
- The discovery.zen.minimum_master_nodes setting is permitted, but ignored, on 7.x nodes.
There are many more examples to be found in the breaking changes documentation.
Notes and good things to know
It is important to visit ALL the breaking changes for each minor version between the version you are using and the version you want to upgrade to.
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.3/breaking-changes-7.3.html
Contains information that is not mentioned on the next page.
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.5/breaking-changes-7.4.html
The best way is to go to the “breaking changes” page of the version you want to upgrade to, and then use the links to page look through all of the minor version pages down to the one you want to upgrade from, paying particular attention to the major version change (eg. 7.0 )
Opster supports all Elasticsearch versions so If you need help reach out
Log Context
Log “failed to parse mapping for type {}: {}” classname is ClusterDeprecationChecks.java.
We extracted the following from Elasticsearch source code for those seeking an in-depth context :
String mappingTypeName = mappingCursor.key; MappingMetaData mappingMetaData = null; try { mappingMetaData = new MappingMetaData(mappingCursor.value); } catch (IOException e) { logger.error("failed to parse mapping for type {}: {}"; mappingTypeName; e); } if (mappingMetaData != null && defaultFieldSet == false) { maxFields.set(IndexDeprecationChecks.countFieldsRecursively(mappingMetaData.type(); mappingMetaData.sourceAsMap())); } if (maxFields.get() > maxClauseCount) {
[ratemypost]